A Gay Mans XXX Blog
Gay Sex Life and Gay Porn, an XXX-rated Gay Man’s Musings.

I have been thinking of filling this blog with gay marriage posts focusing on the big case in the golden state – being treated as a third class citizen, and having to live every day in fear, is starting to wear on me.

So when I saw this, on the blue I think, referring to this dk post, I had to post about it.

http://www.dailykos.com/storyonly/2010/2/2/832988/-The-2010-Comprehensive-Daily-Kos-Research-2000-Poll-of-Self-Identified-Republicans

I don’t know if the poll was well done – you’ll have to check that for yourselves.

Apparently this article is by Kos himself…

As I’ve mentioned before, I’m putting the finishing touches on my new book, American Taliban, which catalogues the ways in which modern-day conservatives share the same agenda as radical Jihadists in the Islamic world. But I found myself making certain claims about Republicans that I didn’t know if they could be backed up. So I thought, “why don’t we ask them directly?” And so, this massive poll, by non-partisan independent pollster Research 2000 of over 2,000 self-identified Republicans, was born.

The results are nothing short of startling.

Ultimately, these results explain why it is impossible for elected Republicans to work with Democrats to improve our country. Their base are conspiracy mongers who don’t believe Obama was born in the United States, that he is the second coming of Lenin, and that he is racist against white people. They already want to impeach him despite the glaringly obvious lack of high crimes or misdemeanors. If any Republican strays and decides to do the right thing and try to work in a bipartisan fashion, they suffer primaries and attacks. Even the Maine twins have quit cooperating out of fear of their homegrown teabaggers.

Given what their base demands, and this poll illustrates them perfectly, it’s no wonder the GOP is the party of no.

Here were the poll’s answers about us:

GAYS

Should openly gay men and women be allowed to serve in the military?

Yes 26
No 55
Not Sure 19

Should same sex couples be allowed to marry?

Yes 7
No 77
Not Sure 16

Should gay couples receive any state or federal benefits?

Yes 11
No 68
Not Sure 21

Should openly gay men and women be allowed to teach in public schools?

Yes 8
No 73
Not Sure 19

Oof. That’s some serious neanderthal action going on. Gays can’t serve their country, teach children, get married, or even have civil unions. That’s the GOP agenda for gays, which makes the existence of the Log Cabin Republicans that much more of a mystery.

It was that last line that got to me today – “the existence of log cabin republicans”. I’m going to be very mean to the logheads from now on.

It has been so crazy at work – so many people fired, and I’m having to work harder to make up for the missing hands and minds. I haven’t had much time to get out and look for new cocks. And I’m stressed out, although I’ve missed the executioners axe many times before, for all I know I might be given my walking papers monday morning.

So it’s saturday night, and I’m craving new experiences and new hard dicks, but I’m staying in to save money (in case I need it) and because its cold and because I’m more worried than usual about my coworkers seeing me with my arms around a man.

So I’m stroking my own dick instead of sucking someone elses – and this is what just got me off….

Here’s a message to the yummy straight guys – them gangstaz have come up with a way that you can come home with me tonight and fuck me up the ass, and get fucked up the ass yourself, with no guilt.

It’s the “NO HOMO” phenomenon and it’s saving the world for gay-curious and metro straight guys with one simple phrase!

Here’s how it works:

Now come home with me you cute bastard! NO HOMO!

Click here for the full length video

I was reading Dan Savage recently – he gives a fellow advice – and in this case I think he may have been entirely wrong, and missing the obvious. Here’s the advice – read it, and I’ll tell you what I think is “the obvious”:

Not the anal toilet plunger guy – BUY A DILDO YOU DOLT – but LIMP…

Go read the post.

http://www.eastbayexpress.com/artsculture/toilet_plunger_as_anal_sex_toy/Content?oid=1216066

My boyfriend always goes soft after he penetrates me. He’s come in me only a handful of times — and I’m a bottom! When it comes to oral, he doesn’t have trouble staying hard. Even more curious: The guy is only 21! Can someone that young really have “erectile dysfunction”? We’ve tried cock rings, and they don’t help: He can keep his hard-on for a little longer (enough time to get inside me without getting soft), but it doesn’t take long for him to get soft again. Dan, what do you think is going on? He’ll be super-hard when I’m sucking him off, then I’ll start jerking him a bit, then he’ll get inside me, and then a very short while later he’s soft. Is there anything we can do? Does he have ED?

Lover Is Missing Poundings

Your boyfriend is hard during oral sex and when you jerk his cock, LIMP, and only loses his erection when he’s in your ass or about to go in. Hmm. That doesn’t sound like ED to me — there’s no such thing as “act-specific ED” — but more like YBDLAS, or “your boyfriend doesn’t like anal sex.”

Your boyfriend may feel pressure to perform, LIMP, as being fucked is important to you. (Please tell me that he’s coming inside a condom when he comes inside you.) And he may feel some pressure to conform. Anal sex among gay men has been elevated to the status of vaginal sex among straight men, LIMP, in that it’s somehow become the defining sex act, despite the fact that roughly a quarter of all gay men don’t enjoy and don’t indulge in anal sex. Your boyfriend may be one of those guys, but he’s too inhibited to tell you how he feels because, hey, it’s buttfucking and he’s gay and all gay men are buttfuckers and if he doesn’t enjoy buttfucking then he’s some sort of defective gay buttfucker.

The very first thing that occured to me reading this story was this.

The boyfriend is doing coke or speed of some kind. The symptoms are classic – he can get hard with direct stimulation, but penetration is more of a whole body than a genital experience, so he loses his hard.

What do you think?

Jeremy is pretty metro in the way he dresses and carries himself, he’s still very much untamed manimal when you get him naked hard and horny. That somewhat hairy body, man fur covering hard muscles, and his huge thick cock makes for an exciting specimen of musky manhood. Then you have Ben, with his beautiful chisled features and flawless skin. Yet there’s masculinity about him that you might not expect. And when he’s getting fucked he’s not a quiet bottom. So putting these two together made for a really hot hunky big boys video. Jeremy is an eager cock sucker, working Benjamin’s hunky big dick like a man of passion. When it’s Benjamin’s turn, he’s all about the pleasure. He slowly and seductively runs his talented mouth all over Jeremy’s cock head, running his tongue up and down the shaft before finally plunging that hunky big man meat deep down his throat. J’s balls were filled with spunk and couldn’t wait to ram his thick cock into Benjamin’s hunky big boy’s ass hole.

I never really understood why so many people think the Dalai Lama is so cool and spiritual. He’s a political and religious leader, not a cutting edge lawbreaking mystic and explorer. Everything he says is right out of the “organized religion as politics” playbook, as far as I can tell.

But, I didn’t know the Dalai Lama is anti-gay, and anti-anal.

He’s a veritable Tibetan Republican.

I’ll bet he’s in the closet.

I was reading about him here…

http://dagblog.com/politics/obama-and-sex-vs-dali-lama-and-wall-street-journal-8-fold-path-unenlightenment-934

1) At a 1997 press conference the Dalai Lama said: “Men to men sex and women to women sex is sexual misconduct.”

Jerry Falwell and the Lama agree: being a homo is a no-no.

2) An interview with 2001 Swiss magazine he said, “Sexual organs were created for sexual reproduction between the male the element and the female element and anything that deviates from this is not acceptable.”

By this definition you shouldn’t even take a piss!

…

5) In the same religious writings he deemed, “Oral sex and anal sex are not acceptable even between a husband and wife.”

Anyone who likes sodomy and/or bj’s and is traveling to Tibet, might wanna rethink their plans.

…

So let’s recap: the Dalai Lama says gay sex, oral sex, anal sex, day sex and abortion are all wrong – is that who you want running a free Tibet? Is this guy we want to pick a fight with China over? He’s a sexaphobe and that’s undemocratic and anticapitalist. I can’t say I’m surprised that the rightwing establishment likes him so much, after all they share some of the Lama’s ideas of intolerance and small-mindedness.

MMMM a nice normal guy in tight underwear, unshaved and naturally manly, a hot young dude to chat up and take home and feast on all night! I like natural men with just enough hair on their bodies to prove that they are men with dicks and calls and testosterone and an appetite for dominating and thrusting and spurting hot cum into my mouth.

How wonderful to see a discussion of gay sex roles and identifications in one of my favorite magazines, scientific american. It’s surprising and heartwarming to see us discussed there so openly and without social censure. It just goes to show you – scientists are HOT! Well some are.

http://www.scientificamerican.com/blog/post.cfm?id=top-scientists-get-to-the-bottom-of-2009-09-16

“It’s my impression that many straight people believe that there are two types of gay men in this world: those who like to give, and those who like to receive. No, I’m not referring to the relative generosity or gift-giving habits of homosexuals. Not exactly, anyway. Rather, the distinction concerns gay men’s sexual role preferences when it comes to the act of anal intercourse. But like most aspects of human sexuality , it’s not quite that simple.

I’m very much aware that some readers may think that this type of article does not belong on this website. But the great thing about good science is that it’s amoral, objective and doesn’t cater to the court of public opinion. Data don’t cringe; people do. Whether we’re talking about a penis in a vagina or one in an anus, it’s human behavior all the same. The ubiquity of homosexual behavior alone makes it fascinating. What’s more, the study of self-labels in gay men has considerable applied value, such as its possible predictive capacity in tracking risky sexual behaviors and safe sex practices.

People who derive more pleasure (or perhaps suffer less anxiety or discomfort) from acting as the insertive partner are referred to colloquially as “tops,” whereas those who have a clear preference for serving as the receptive partner are commonly known as “bottoms.” There are plenty of other descriptive slang terms for this gay male dichotomy as well, some repeatable (“pitchers vs. catchers,” “active vs. passive,” “dominant vs. submissive”) and others not—well, not for Scientific American , anyway.”

By this article’s standards, I’m a versatile, I tend to top a bit more than my partners, but that’s because they like it, I get the most physical pleasure from letting myself go and really being teh bottom.

“

(3) Tops were more likely than both bottoms and versatiles to reject a gay self-identity and to have had sex with a woman in the past three months. They also manifested higher internalized homophobia—essentially the degree of self-loathing linked to their homosexual desires.

(4) Versatiles seem to enjoy better psychological health. Hart and his coauthors speculate that this may be due to their greater sexual sensation seeking, lower erotophobia (fear of sex), and greater comfort with a variety of roles and activities.”

This was interesting – I wonder if I’m a service top lolz…..

“Further complexity is suggested by the fact that many gay men go one step further and use secondary self-labels, such as “service top” and “power bottom” (a pairing in which the top is actually submissive to the bottom). For the right scientist, there’s a life’s work just waiting to be had.”